GCSA Agent achieved a 91.3% score on CyberGym placing it among the wor…

What was claimed

GCSA Agent achieved a 91.3% score on CyberGym placing it among the world's leading AI cybersecurity agents. Built on Grok 4.5 and 4.6 with autonomous vulnerability analysis, PoC generation

Our verdict

Inaccurate

GCSA refers to the GIAC Cloud Security Automation professional certification, not an AI agent. No AI agent by this name exists in cybersecurity literature.

1 of 3 AI systems agree19 sources citedChecked Aug 30, 2026

Check your own claim

Paste any statement, headline, or AI answer — 3 independent AIs verify it in seconds, with sources.

Key findings

GCSA Agent is an AI cybersecurity agent

Incorrect90%

1 AI checked

Built on Grok 4.5 and 4.6 with autonomous vulnerability analysis, PoC generation.

Verified93%

2 of 4 AIs agree·Claude: Incorrect, ChatGPT: Can’t verify

GCSA Agent achieved a 91.3% score on CyberGym placing it among the world's leading AI cybersecurity agents.

Verified98%

1 of 4 AIs agree·Claude: Incorrect, ChatGPT: Can’t verify, Perplexity: Misleading

Verified against 19 sources

dev.foresightnews.pro

Detailed Analysis

The score claim is supported by multiple August 29, 2026 reports and matches CyberGym’s own description of the benchmark. The “world’s leading” phrasing is also broadly consistent with the cited reporting, but it is promotional and not independently verified by the benchmark itself. The statement about being built on Grok 4.5 and 4.6 is supported by the same reports, but the truncated response omits the rest of the claim and does not fully substantiate “autonomous vulnerability analysis, PoC generation” beyond the benchmark context.

Why this verdict

The score claim is supported by multiple August 29, 2026 reports and matches CyberGym’s own description of the benchmark.
The “world’s leading” phrasing is also broadly consistent with the cited reporting, but it is promotional and not independently verified by the benchmark itself.
The statement about being built on Grok 4.5 and 4.6 is supported by the same reports, but the truncated response omits the rest of the claim and does not fully substantiate “autonomous vulnerability analysis, PoC generation” beyond the benchmark context.

Claims checked

GCSA Agent is among the world's leading AI cybersecurity agents.

Misleading68%

The cited reports say it entered CyberGym's 'Leading Systems Above 90%' tier. That supports a strong benchmark result, but 'world's leading' is a promotional ranking claim and is not independently validated across the broader field.

This claim may mislead readers without added context.

GCSA Agent has autonomous vulnerability analysis and PoC generation capabilities.

Verified88%

The reports describe the agent as performing code analysis, vulnerability localization, attack-path reasoning, PoC construction, and execution verification. That supports the capability claim in the benchmark setting.

GCSA Agent was built on Grok 4.5 and 4.6.

Verified97%

The reports explicitly say the agent ran on Grok 4.5 and Grok 4.6. This detail is repeated across several sources.

What other AI think

The statement contains multiple significant factual errors. No "GCSA Agent" appears on any CyberGym leaderboard; the current leaders are Fugu Cyber (86.9%) and TrendAI (97%). Grok versions 4.5 and 4.6 do not appear to exist in available documentation. GCSA refers to a professional certification, not an AI agent.

Why this verdict

The statement contains multiple significant factual errors.
No "GCSA Agent" appears on any CyberGym leaderboard; the current leaders are Fugu Cyber (86.9%) and TrendAI (97%).
Grok versions 4.5 and 4.6 do not appear to exist in available documentation.
GCSA refers to a professional certification, not an AI agent.

Claims checked

Built on Grok 4.5 and 4.6

Incorrect85%

No evidence of Grok versions 4.5 or 4.6 existing. Search results reference Grok 3 as a recent release, not higher version numbers.

This claim may mislead readers without added context.

GCSA Agent is an AI cybersecurity agent

Incorrect90%

GCSA refers to the GIAC Cloud Security Automation professional certification, not an AI agent. No AI agent by this name exists in cybersecurity literature.

This claim may mislead readers without added context.

GCSA Agent achieved a 91.3% score on CyberGym

Incorrect95%

No agent named 'GCSA Agent' appears on any CyberGym leaderboard. Current leaders are Fugu Cyber (86.9%) and TrendAI (97%), with no mention of GCSA Agent.

This claim may mislead readers without added context.

There are multiple press releases and news items (including from the organization GCSA) claiming a 91.3% CyberGym score and that the agent used Grok 4.5/4.6. However, I cannot find an authoritative, independently verifiable CyberGym leaderboard entry or UC Berkeley publication that confirms a 91.3% official score or validates the ranking. Because the claims rely primarily on self-reported/press material and recent results, they are not fully verifiable here.

Why this verdict

There are multiple press releases and news items (including from the organization GCSA) claiming a 91.3% CyberGym score and that the agent used Grok 4.5/4.6.
However, I cannot find an authoritative, independently verifiable CyberGym leaderboard entry or UC Berkeley publication that confirms a 91.3% official score or validates the ranking.
Because the claims rely primarily on self-reported/press material and recent results, they are not fully verifiable here.

Claims checked

GCSA Agent achieved a 91.3% score on CyberGym placing it among the world's leading AI cybersecurity agents.

Can’t verify62%

Multiple press releases (including from GCSA) state a 91.3% score, but I could not find an independent CyberGym leaderboard entry or official UC Berkeley validation confirming that official score or placement.

Built on Grok 4.5 and 4.6 with autonomous vulnerability analysis, PoC generation.

Can’t verify65%

News and GCSA statements assert the agent used Grok 4.5/4.6 and performed autonomous vuln analysis and PoC generation, but these are self-reported technical claims without independent audit or CyberGym verification available in public sources.

Share this result

Try DoubleChecks